"It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife." -- Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice
That's not the response I was hoping for, Kilty ... I was sorta hoping you might be willing to defend your exalted spot by importing (or entering) some more data.
The first step is to calculate a S/N for each thread. Views / Posts will get larger as S/N does (this is based on the assumption that lots of views without replies are threads that require thought before reply - i.e. signal)
assign each post a within that thread that V/P value.
to calculate the S/N of a poster, do something like taking the mean of V/P values for each post.
that's about all I've thought.
oh: Disregard posts in threads that are shorter than, say, 15 posts since the ratio could be skewed by that.
"I'm the family radical. The rest are terribly stuffy. Aside from Aunt - she's just odd."
Doesnt really work - I've started substantiave threads that've gotten a fair number of views, but fairly few replies. By that measure, they're low S/N ratio. The number would be even worse if such a thread had outside linkage that drew in hits from other sites.
Before we shoot it down let's look at the numbers and see if they tell us anything. I calculated a percent using kvetch's proposal of Post vs. Views using the ten most recent threads in each area. A lower number is a lower signal to noise ratio (good) and a higher number a higher signal to noise ratio (not so good).
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you,
S Adams
Ghost wrote:Before we shoot it down let's look at the numbers and see if they tell us anything. I calculated a percent using kvetch's proposal of Post vs. Views using the ten most recent threads in each area. A lower number is a lower signal to noise ratio (good) and a higher number a higher signal to noise ratio (not so good).
Just to continue to boggle people minds (one of my past-times). I calculated a similar ratio for people who started threads: Posts vs. Views. This is not very scientific with just ten threads to analysis.
felonius 11.8%
Ghost 13.1%
Brad 14.8%
Cho 21.0%
Kahrey 26.2%
MidasKnight 43.6%
kvetch 46.8%
Hunter B 54.3%
If you never start any threads you can’t be ranked.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you,
S Adams
"It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife." -- Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice
It seems that my method works here. Critic's corner is the lowest, and Margins the highest. PLT&H and Soapbox are pretty high.
felonius 11.8%
Ghost 13.1%
Brad 14.8%
Cho 21.0%
Kahrey 26.2%
MidasKnight 43.6%
kvetch 46.8%
Hunter B 54.3%
This is perhaps a bit dodgier, but Brad is low and I am high. it makes sense.
kilt: surely the views and posts of each thread are already stored as values somewhere in the Db? and the only calculations Ghost has done is ( posts / views ) * 100 and taking means. getting the value it to depend on ALL posts by a user might be difficult, but basing it on the threads you have started should be easier... (OK, not EASY, but easier)
"I'm the family radical. The rest are terribly stuffy. Aside from Aunt - she's just odd."