This thread has gone at a slight tangent from the original subject which was a discussion about Arms Commander, but at the risk of de-railing it further, I am puzzled by something which is linked to the most recent posts: namely e-books.
There is an interesting article written recently in Publishers Weekly here:
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6657272.html
Basically, what it is saying is that at the moment, Amazon are actually losing money on Kindle e-books as publishers are charging them the same amount as printed books. There is speculation as to why Amazon are doing this with the most likely answer being a price war with other e-book suppliers or that Amazon are trying to build up market share.
However, what I am asking is why are publishers charging so much for e-books since basically, there are no printing, manufacturing, shipping or handling costs? This is briefly addressed at the end of the article: publishers are saying printing etc. is only a fraction of the costs involved in producing a book yet from what Mr. Modesitt says, certainly his royalties are not greater from an e-book than from a printed one.
My reason for asking is that I am interesting in e-book readers but not while the selection of books is so small. For example, John Scalzi, a fairly well- known author, does not have any of his science fiction books on Kindle. Even Mr. Modesitt does not have all of his books on Kindle nor on Fictionwise.com.
Surely, e-books would grow the market or am I missing the obvious and it is because publishers fear that e-books would end traditional publishing? Would it also not be a great way to re-introduce OOP books back into the market?
Oh, and I did get a copy of Arms Commander in hardback form, though I have yet to read it.