Arthur C Clarke - Rendezvous with Rama - 7
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 8:26 pm
<img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0553287893.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg" align="left"> Rendezvous with Rama /Rama /1
Rendezvous with Rama is a celebrated book, winner of both the Hugo and Nebula awards. It's definitely an interesting and thought provoking book, and a fairly quick read. But I can only give it a lukewarm endorsement.
It features a lot more description of puzzling alien structures than story. In fact you might say that Clarke's conception of Rama, a massive alien artifact that suddenly appears in our solar system, is the whole book. Don't expect much in terms of brilliant dialogue or finely drawn characterization. I found the early scenes of exploration to be quite compelling, but from the point that the encircling lake/sea/river turned green, the later discoveries and developments (things like the checkerboard field patterns from the southern half of Rama) seemed arbitrary and on some level pointless. And I thought the "paranoid-colonists-from-Mercury" subplot added nothing to the book.
Clarke leaves many unanswered questions, but I suppose that's a good reason to read the sequels.
Rendezvous with Rama is a celebrated book, winner of both the Hugo and Nebula awards. It's definitely an interesting and thought provoking book, and a fairly quick read. But I can only give it a lukewarm endorsement.
It features a lot more description of puzzling alien structures than story. In fact you might say that Clarke's conception of Rama, a massive alien artifact that suddenly appears in our solar system, is the whole book. Don't expect much in terms of brilliant dialogue or finely drawn characterization. I found the early scenes of exploration to be quite compelling, but from the point that the encircling lake/sea/river turned green, the later discoveries and developments (things like the checkerboard field patterns from the southern half of Rama) seemed arbitrary and on some level pointless. And I thought the "paranoid-colonists-from-Mercury" subplot added nothing to the book.
Clarke leaves many unanswered questions, but I suppose that's a good reason to read the sequels.