On the reliability of increasingly ubiquitous online ratings

Have some corrections or additions for our database and/or our contribution statistics ? Want to join our Data Editing team ? Let us know.

Moderator: Darb

Post Reply
User avatar
clong
Blade Runner
Posts: 9253
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:48 am
Location: Rochester, NY
Contact:

On the reliability of increasingly ubiquitous online ratings

Post by clong »

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/fan ... s-ratings/

There was a fair amount of discussion about this issue back when we were talking to the folks at iblist.com about the possibility of merging the two sites. Despite the fact that our book ratings system has never really taken off here at ibdof.com, I find this an interesting an important topic.
User avatar
CodeBlower
Shakespearean Groupie
Posts: 1735
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:27 am
Location: IL, USA
Contact:

Re: On the reliability of increasingly ubiquitous online ratings

Post by CodeBlower »

Forgive the belated post - I've been away..

If the author of the article truly believed this..
Over 7,000 people had reviewed it, and it had an average of 3 out of 5 stars. This is going to be a decent movie.
.. they are without hope -- or they have more money than sense.

Generally, movie reviews are the only thing that people will bother posting a mediocre rating for.

On those, I generally pick a movie in that genre that I've already seen, find a reviewer whose tastes match my own, and follow their other ratings to find something new to watch.

For shopping, people really only give feedback if they really liked or really hated a product.

In general, I pay more attention to the write-up than the rating.
"Budge up, yeh great lump." -- Hagrid, HP:SS
-=-
The gelding is what the gelding is, unlike people who change in response to their perceptions of events that may benefit or threaten their power. -- Lorn, Chapter LXXXII, Magi'i of Cyador
Post Reply

Return to “IBDoF Site & Database Discussion”